In a recent post, I defended divas โ people who insist on having the perfect conditions to perform at their best.
๐๐๐ ๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ๐, ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น ๐บ๐ฎ๐ด๐ถ๐ฐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ป๐ด๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ปโ๐ ๐ด๐ผ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ผ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ป.
Take ๐๐ฒ๐ถ๐๐ต ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐โ๐ ๐๐ผฬ๐น๐ป ๐๐ผ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ as an example. In 1975, he was given a piano that was out of tune and not the model heโd requested.ย
By all rights, Jarrett could have walked away. Instead, he embraced the limitations and delivered one of the most iconic and best-selling jazz recordings of all time.
If he had refused to play because the conditions werenโt perfect, we wouldnโt have that masterpiece today.
Having high standards is essential. But insisting on perfection can cause us to miss those moments where creativity and adaptability spark something truly remarkable.
When presenting, I do my best work when I can control the setup. For example, I refuse to submit my slides weeks in advance, so I can update content right before the show.ย
But Iโve also learned that ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ป, ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐ถ๐ณ, ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ป๐ด๐ ๐ด๐ผ ๐๐ฟ๐ผ๐ป๐ด, ๐ ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ป ๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ๐ ๐ณ๐ถ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ป๐ฒ๐ ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ฒ๐ ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐ผ๐.
The key is balancing those high standards with flexibility.
Because while perfection might be the goal, itโs often the imperfections that lead to brilliance.
Comments